The Other 'burg

The Other 'burg: A New Yorker's Life in search of St. Petersburg

The other day I ran into my academic idol and she gave me some random advice. While we were on the topic of strategizing how to complete scholarship in a timely manner I thought I’d throw her a question I’d been grappling with: what do you do when you have completed about five hours of work, you’d like to put in another three hours for the day, but you’re too restless continuing what you have been working on? Do you spend the next three hours organizing notes, catching up on historiography, or just keep slogging through your current project, even though it’s boring you out of your mind?

She had absolutely no comprehension of what I was saying. She explained, “I just … always work. My schedule isn’t regimented, so sometimes I’ll end up spending an hour writing an email. But I’ll make up that time later, at night.”

I guess this is why she wins so many awards, has a coveted job, and has published so widely at her relatively young age.

I will never be the person who works around the clock. But this conversation confirmed me to that I really need to put in more hours. For the last couple of months, I have just sort of woken up when I have woken up, and regardless of how much work I’ve gotten done, I’ve stuck to a pretty generous work-out schedule that usually interrupts my day. If I’ve had to go to campus, I don’t really change my schedule—I just stop my work sooner to fit in the trip.

So, last week I started keeping tabs on how many hours I worked. It forced me to set my alarm for an early hour so that I could log at least 8 hours of solid work each day and to actually be strategic about waking up extra early on the day I went to campus. Last week was the first time in a long time that I felt super productive. This week I’ll continue to log, but I will also note which project I am working on.

All of this is to say that I thrive on discipline and perish on flexibility and spontaneity.

I have written six pages today, for a grand total of 12.5 pages. Pretty good for three days of writing. I’m exhausted because I stayed up a little too last night. I think I’m going to take a power-nap and re-group.

thedailywhat:

Bollywood By Way Of Finland of the Day: Finnair provided passengers aboard a recent flight to Delhi with some unexpected in-flight entertainment: Flight attendants doing a Bollywood-themed dance in honor of India’s Republic Day.

[slog.]

Another reason to love FinnAir!

6.5 pages. Now time for gym, then some business on campus. I probably won’t have time later to write another half page. But that’s cool.

barackobama:

Meet Debbie Bosanek, otherwise known as Warren Buffett’s secretary—and the inspiration behind the “Buffett Rule.”

Hm…

It seems that the Romney camp’s way of spinning things is to emphasize that he acted legally when paying his taxes. The Romneys are also emphasizing that it is not their “fault” that they pay low taxes. Both arguments miss the point (purposely, I’m sure) of the debate on taxes. No one is accusing Romney of tax fraud or blaming him for his low tax rate.

Romney’s taxes just happen to epitomize what is frustrating to middle-class Americans (or, at least, to this middle-class American, me). First, it does seem that Romney should pay at least the same percentage as others in taxes. As Elizabeth Warren has so perfectly articulated, he couldn’t have been so successful without the infrastructure and education provided by Americans. He should pay his success forward to future Americans. Second, it is troubling that members of government have created a tax code that they and their lobbyist supporters benefit from. I demand more from my representatives! And while the taxes Romney has paid in the past are not his fault, it has been shown that his proposed plan would continue to favor him. So, that would be his fault.

Finally, what really irked me was Ann Romney’s comment, as seen in this clip, that Mitt has been incredibly successful and “unfortunately that was made abundantly clear” when they released his taxes.

Wait. Why is it “unfortunate” that the extent of Romney’s success has been publicized? As Obama himself said in the SOTU, Americans admire people who are successful. I do not begrudge Romney’s wealth and actually kind of marvel at it. Why should it be something that is hidden?

This kind of language, and the defensiveness of the Romney campaign regarding Romney’s taxes, leads me to believe that Romney is well-aware of just how unfair the current and his proposed tax codes are and he doesn’t want that to be plainly revealed to the public.

2.5 pages down. Not stellar. Not horrible. I usually write better in the mornings, so how about I aim for seven completed pages tomorrow?

When I return from my afternoon swim (yes, I am so lucky that I can take off in the middle of the day), I will begin to write my fourth chapter.